Comparative Measurement of Biogas Generation of Ziziphusspina - Christi (L.) Wild Leaves and Cow Dung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70882/josrar.2024.v1i1.3Keywords:
Biodigester, Biogas, Proximate, ZiziphusspinaAbstract
To increase the production of biogas from an appropriate substrate, anaerobic co-digestion techniques are required. Methane generation and process stability can be enhanced by co-digesting animal dung and suitable biomass with a low carbon content. The objective of the study is to determine the proximate parameters and compare the biogas generation from a sample of plants sown with cow manure and leaves of Ziziphusspina. Over the course of 42 days, the experiment was conducted using a homemade anaerobic digester in the lab. Even yet, the amount of biogas produced by the plant sample was not as high as that produced by the plant sample that was fertilized with cow manure.For additional advantageous uses, such as the creation of biofertilizers, the physico-chemistry of fresh samples and spent slurries in the biodigesters might be investigated. This work has potential applications in underdeveloped nations, particularly in rural areas with abundant biological waste and limited access to energy.
References
Abubakar, A.A. (2017). Biogas Potential of Some Selected Kitchen Wastes Within Kaduna Metropolis. American Journal of Engineering Research, 6 (5): 53-63.
Ahmad, U. (2000). Nutrients Determination of Biogas produced from three different Aquatic Weeds. M.Sc. Dissertation. Department of Pure and Applied chemistry, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria
Allen, S.E., Grinshaw, H.M., Parlinson, J.A. and Quarmbly, C. (1994). Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials, Blackwell Scientific Publication, London.
Arbonnier, M. (2004). Trees, shrubs and lianas of West African dry zones. CIRAD, Margraf Publishers GmbH, Paris. 212 – 219.
Bagudo, B. U., Garba. B., Dangoggo. S.M. and Hassan L.G. (2008). “Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Locally Sourced Substrate Materials” Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 16 (2): 269 – 274.
Dangoggo, S.M, Sambo A.S. and Zuru, A.A. (2004). Biogas Production from Camel, Cattle and Donkey dung. Nigerian Journal of Renewable Energy,12 (1&2): 7 – 11.
Dangoggo, S.M. and Fernando, C.E.C. (1986). A simple Biogas Plant with Additional Gas Storage System. Nigerian Journal of Solar Energy, 5:138-141
El Amin, H.M. (1990). Trees and shrubs of the Sudan. Ithaca Press Exeter, Ithaca. 211 – 217.
Ezekoye,V.A., Onah, D.U.,Offor, P.O. and Ezekoye, B.A. (2014) Characterization of Biogas Produced from Rice Husk and Algae Using a Metal Fixed- Dome Biodigester. Global Journal ofScience Frontier Research. G. Bio- Tech and Genetics. 14(1): 24 – 31.
Garba, B. (1999). Challenges in energy biotechnology with special reference to biogas technology” A Paper presented at the 12th annual conference of the Biotechnology Society of Nigeria at the National Institute for Fresh Water Fisheries Research Institute, (NIFFRI), New Bussa.
Hobson, P.N., Bousfield, S. and Summers, R. (1999). Methane Production from Agricultural and Domestic Wastes. Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London, UK.
Kayhanian, M. and Rich, D. (1995). Pilot Scale High Solids Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste with an Emphasis on Nutrient Requirements. Biomass & Bioenergy, 8: 433-444.
Lusks, P. (1998). Methane Recovery from Animal Manures Current Opportunities Case Book. US Dept of Energy Report , NREL/SR580-25145.
Richard, T. (1996). The Effect of Lignin on Biodegradability. Cornell Composting, Cornel Waste Management Institute.
Said, A., Huefner, A., Tabl, E.S.A.A. and Fawzy, G. (2006). Two new cyclic amino acids from the seeds and antiviral activity of methanolic extract of the roots of Ziziphusspina-christi. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Congress on Medicinal Plant Research. Planta Medica. 72
Tambuwal, A.D. and Ogbiko, C. (2018). Proximate and Chemical Analyses of Selected Agricultural Wastes Used for Biogas Production. Science Research Annals. 9(1): 56-60.
Von-Maydell, H.J. (1986). Trees and shrubs of the Sahel: their characteristics and uses. Deutsche Gesellschaftfu¨ r TechnischeZusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn.
Wilkie, A.C. (2005). Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure: Design and Process Consideration. In: Dairy Manure Management: Treatments, Handling, and Community Relations, Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, Cornell University, USA.
Yadav, N., Kumar, R., Rawat, L. and Gupta, S. (2014). Physico-Chemical Properties of Before and After Anaerobic Digestion of Jatropha Seed Cake and Mixed With Pure Cow Dung. JChemEng Process Technol, 5: 186. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7048.1000186
Yerima, I., Ngulde, Y.M., Abubakar, M., Ngala, A.L. (2019). The Influence of Proximate Composition of Cow Dung on the Rate and Volume of Biogas Generation in Maiduguri, North Eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 4(1): 146 – 153. DOI: 10.22161/ijeab/4.1.24
Ziana, Z. and Rajesh, P. (2015). Production and Analysis of Biogas from Kitchen Waste. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(4): 622 – 632
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Science Research and Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
