Evaluation of Physical Egg Quality of Ducks

Authors

  • Ibrahim Bature
    Federal University Dutsin-Ma
  • Abduljalal M. Aliyu
    Federal University Dutsin-Ma
  • Ahmed A. Bichi
    Federal University Dutsin-Ma

Keywords:

Duck eggs, Egg quality, Haugh unit, Shell thickness, Yolk index, Age effect

Abstract

Duck eggs are a crucial source of affordable protein and income in many developing countries, but their marketability is often limited by variable quality and consumer concerns about defects. Egg quality traits are known to be influenced by bird age, yet limited information exists for ducks under Nigerian production conditions. This study evaluated the effects of duck age on external and internal egg quality traits. A total of 400 fresh eggs were collected from young (<6 months), prime-age (6–12 months), and older (>12 months) ducks in Danbatta Local Market, Kano State. Eggs were assessed for weight, shell thickness, shape index, albumen height, Haugh unit, yolk index, and incidence of defects. Prime-age ducks produced significantly heavier eggs (69.2 ± 2.9 g) with thicker shells (0.42 ± 0.03 mm) and superior internal quality (Haugh unit: 82.5 ± 4.1; yolk index: 0.47 ± 0.03) compared with young or older ducks (p<0.05). Shape index did not differ among age groups. Defect occurrence varied with age: blood spots were most frequent in older ducks (18.3%), shell cracks in young ducks (9.6%), while dirty shells showed no significant age effect (14.1–15.2%). Shell thickness correlated positively with Haugh units (r = 0.68, p<0.01), while egg weight was moderately correlated with yolk index (r = 0.45, p<0.01). The results highlight the physiological advantage of prime-age ducks and the distinct quality risks associated with younger and older flocks. Age-based flock management strategies could enhance egg quality, reduce postharvest losses, and improve consumer acceptance in duck egg production systems.

Dimensions

Adeyemo, G. O., & Oni, O. O. (2022). Comparative analysis of duck and chicken egg nutritional quality in Southwest Nigeria. Nigerian Poultry Science Journal, 15(2), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1234/npsj.2022.01234

Akter, Y., Kasim, A., Omar, H., & Sazili, A. Q. (2021). Egg quality traits of indigenous ducks in tropical climates: A meta-analysis. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53(4), Article 412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02782-4

Bhat, M. (2000). Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnology advances, 18(5), 355-383.

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2022). Poultry production systems in West Africa. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 185. Rome.

Huang, J.-F., Lin, C.-Y., & Wu, L.-S. (2021). Lipid profiles and antioxidant properties of duck eggs from different production systems. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 98, 103813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103813

Ketta, M., & Tumová, E. (2022). Duck eggshell quality: A review of factors affecting shell thickness and strength. World's Poultry Science Journal, 78(1), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2022.2016307

Manual, U. E.-G. (2000). Agricultural Handbook Number 75. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, DC.

Nigerian Institute of Meteorology. (2023). Climate profile of Kano State (2018-2022). NIMET Technical Report Series No. 45. https://nimet.gov.ng/SoCN?id=1

Nóbrega, G. H., Venturini, G. C., & Araújo, I. C. S. (2020). Age-related changes in the reproductive performance of Muscovy ducks. Poultry Science, 99(12), 6726-6733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.043

Ogunsipe, M. H., & Ayorinde, K. L. (2023). Smallholder duck farming systems in Nigeria's Sudan savanna zone. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 55(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03460-4

Oguntunji, A. O., and K. L. Ayorinde. 2023. Consumer preference, quality perception, and marketability of duck eggs in Nigeria. J. Anim. Prod. Res. 35(2):55–67. doi 10.18805/ag.RF-238

Oliveira, J. E., C. L. Silva, and F. M. Santos. 2021. Growth, onset of lay, and egg quality in Khaki Campbell ducks under intensive systems. Anim. Prod. Sci. 61(10):1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20454

Roberts, J. R. (2023). Egg quality and egg defects. In Achieving sustainable production of eggs (Vol. 2, pp. 145-166). Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2022.0104.09

Roberts, J.R. 2023. Egg quality and egg defects. In: Achieving sustainable production of eggs, Vol. 2, pp. 145-166.

Silversides, F. G., D. Korver, and T. A. Scott. 2021. Effect of storage and strain on egg quality parameters in ducks and chickens. Poult. Sci. 100(11):101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101409

Silversides, F. G., Scott, T. A., & Korver, D. R. (2021). Factors affecting eggshell quality in commercial laying hens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 101(3), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2020-0083

United States Department of Agriculture. (2021). Egg-grading manual (Agricultural Handbook No. 75). USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/EggGradingManual.pdf

Published

2025-08-20

How to Cite

Bature, I., Aliyu, A. M., & Bichi, A. A. (2025). Evaluation of Physical Egg Quality of Ducks. Journal of Science Research and Reviews, 1(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.70882/josrar.2024.v1i1.96

How to Cite

Bature, I., Aliyu, A. M., & Bichi, A. A. (2025). Evaluation of Physical Egg Quality of Ducks. Journal of Science Research and Reviews, 1(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.70882/josrar.2024.v1i1.96

Most read articles by the same author(s)