Evaluation of Physical Egg Quality of Ducks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70882/josrar.2024.v1i1.96Keywords:
Duck eggs, Egg quality, Haugh unit, Shell thickness, Yolk index, Age effectAbstract
Duck eggs are a crucial source of affordable protein and income in many developing countries, but their marketability is often limited by variable quality and consumer concerns about defects. Egg quality traits are known to be influenced by bird age, yet limited information exists for ducks under Nigerian production conditions. This study evaluated the effects of duck age on external and internal egg quality traits. A total of 400 fresh eggs were collected from young (<6 months), prime-age (6–12 months), and older (>12 months) ducks in Danbatta Local Market, Kano State. Eggs were assessed for weight, shell thickness, shape index, albumen height, Haugh unit, yolk index, and incidence of defects. Prime-age ducks produced significantly heavier eggs (69.2 ± 2.9 g) with thicker shells (0.42 ± 0.03 mm) and superior internal quality (Haugh unit: 82.5 ± 4.1; yolk index: 0.47 ± 0.03) compared with young or older ducks (p<0.05). Shape index did not differ among age groups. Defect occurrence varied with age: blood spots were most frequent in older ducks (18.3%), shell cracks in young ducks (9.6%), while dirty shells showed no significant age effect (14.1–15.2%). Shell thickness correlated positively with Haugh units (r = 0.68, p<0.01), while egg weight was moderately correlated with yolk index (r = 0.45, p<0.01). The results highlight the physiological advantage of prime-age ducks and the distinct quality risks associated with younger and older flocks. Age-based flock management strategies could enhance egg quality, reduce postharvest losses, and improve consumer acceptance in duck egg production systems.
References
Adeyemo, G. O., & Oni, O. O. (2022). Comparative analysis of duck and chicken egg nutritional quality in Southwest Nigeria. Nigerian Poultry Science Journal, 15(2), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1234/npsj.2022.01234
Akter, Y., Kasim, A., Omar, H., & Sazili, A. Q. (2021). Egg quality traits of indigenous ducks in tropical climates: A meta-analysis. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53(4), Article 412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02782-4
Bhat, M. (2000). Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnology advances, 18(5), 355-383.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2022). Poultry production systems in West Africa. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 185. Rome.
Huang, J.-F., Lin, C.-Y., & Wu, L.-S. (2021). Lipid profiles and antioxidant properties of duck eggs from different production systems. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 98, 103813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103813
Ketta, M., & Tumová, E. (2022). Duck eggshell quality: A review of factors affecting shell thickness and strength. World's Poultry Science Journal, 78(1), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2022.2016307
Manual, U. E.-G. (2000). Agricultural Handbook Number 75. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, DC.
Nigerian Institute of Meteorology. (2023). Climate profile of Kano State (2018-2022). NIMET Technical Report Series No. 45. https://nimet.gov.ng/SoCN?id=1
Nóbrega, G. H., Venturini, G. C., & Araújo, I. C. S. (2020). Age-related changes in the reproductive performance of Muscovy ducks. Poultry Science, 99(12), 6726-6733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.043
Ogunsipe, M. H., & Ayorinde, K. L. (2023). Smallholder duck farming systems in Nigeria's Sudan savanna zone. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 55(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03460-4
Oguntunji, A. O., and K. L. Ayorinde. 2023. Consumer preference, quality perception, and marketability of duck eggs in Nigeria. J. Anim. Prod. Res. 35(2):55–67. doi 10.18805/ag.RF-238
Oliveira, J. E., C. L. Silva, and F. M. Santos. 2021. Growth, onset of lay, and egg quality in Khaki Campbell ducks under intensive systems. Anim. Prod. Sci. 61(10):1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20454
Roberts, J. R. (2023). Egg quality and egg defects. In Achieving sustainable production of eggs (Vol. 2, pp. 145-166). Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2022.0104.09
Roberts, J.R. 2023. Egg quality and egg defects. In: Achieving sustainable production of eggs, Vol. 2, pp. 145-166.
Silversides, F. G., D. Korver, and T. A. Scott. 2021. Effect of storage and strain on egg quality parameters in ducks and chickens. Poult. Sci. 100(11):101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101409
Silversides, F. G., Scott, T. A., & Korver, D. R. (2021). Factors affecting eggshell quality in commercial laying hens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 101(3), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2020-0083
United States Department of Agriculture. (2021). Egg-grading manual (Agricultural Handbook No. 75). USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/EggGradingManual.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Science Research and Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
